linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH] mseal sysmap: add arch-support txt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABi2SkWU6orm-wBFKVt9rsSpYURHPb7fjHRzkOiPGd=Lh-DdkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:14:36 -0700
From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, 
	Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, 
	gor@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, kees@...nel.org, 
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-mm@...ck.org, svens@...ux.ibm.com, thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mseal sysmap: add arch-support txt

On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 3:41 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 at 23:26, Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 10:21 PM Lorenzo Stoakes
> > <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 12:06:23AM +0000, jeffxu@...omium.org wrote:
> > > > From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
> > > > Add Documentation/features/core/mseal_sys_mappings/arch-support.txt
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/features/core/mseal_sys_mappings/arch-support.txt
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
> > > > +#
> > > > +# Feature name:          mseal-system-mappings
> > > > +#         Kconfig:       ARCH_SUPPORTS_MSEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS
> > > > +#         description:   arch supports mseal system mappings
> > > > +#
> > > > +    -----------------------
> > > > +    |         arch |status|
> > > > +    -----------------------
> > > > +    |       alpha: | TODO |
> > > > +    |         arc: | TODO |
> > > > +    |         arm: |  N/A |
> > > > +    |       arm64: |  ok  |
> > > > +    |        csky: | TODO |
> > > > +    |     hexagon: | TODO |
> > > > +    |   loongarch: | TODO |
> > > > +    |        m68k: | TODO |
> > > > +    |  microblaze: | TODO |
> > > > +    |        mips: | TODO |
> > > > +    |       nios2: | TODO |
> > > > +    |    openrisc: | TODO |
> > > > +    |      parisc: | TODO |
> > > > +    |     powerpc: | TODO |
> > > > +    |       riscv: | TODO |
> > > > +    |        s390: |  ok  |
> > > > +    |          sh: | TODO |
> > > > +    |       sparc: | TODO |
> > > > +    |          um: | TODO |
> > > > +    |         x86: |  ok  |
> > > > +    |      xtensa: | TODO |
> > > > +    -----------------------
>
> > > Plus I feel this need expansion a bit 'N/A' is because of being non-64 bit
> > > right?
> > >
> > Below is the definition of N/A in Documentation/features/arch-support.txt
> >    | N/A|  # feature doesn't apply to the architecture
> >
> > It fits the arm case because mseal is not supported in 32 bit.
>
> IIUIC, you can already s@...O@N/A@ for all other 32-bit architectures,
> so we don't accidentally spend time on looking into adding the support?
>
Sure, my architecture knowledge is limited.

I just checked this, it seems to me that csky, m68k, nios2, sh, xtensa
doesn't have 64 bits support, the rest have 64 bits. Is this correct ?

Thanks
-Jeff



> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                         Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds