[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202504221339.65ED2943C@keescook>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 13:39:49 -0700
From: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2][next] kunit/overflow: Add tests for
STACK_FLEX_ARRAY_SIZE() helper
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 11:22:08AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Add a couple of tests for new STACK_FLEX_ARRAY_SIZE() helper.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> ---
> lib/tests/overflow_kunit.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/tests/overflow_kunit.c b/lib/tests/overflow_kunit.c
> index 894691b4411a..3beb497a44be 100644
> --- a/lib/tests/overflow_kunit.c
> +++ b/lib/tests/overflow_kunit.c
> @@ -1210,6 +1210,9 @@ static void DEFINE_FLEX_test(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, __struct_size(empty->array), 0);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, __member_size(empty->array), 0);
>
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, STACK_FLEX_ARRAY_SIZE(two, array), 2);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, STACK_FLEX_ARRAY_SIZE(eight, array), 8);
Nice! Can you add a 0 test for "empty" as well?
> +
> /* If __counted_by is not being used, array size will have the on-stack size. */
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CC_HAS_COUNTED_BY))
> array_size_override = 2 * sizeof(s16);
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists