linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH v2] slab: Decouple slab_debug and no_hash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aEdANsGsQHqVQ9Wy@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 23:12:38 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
	Sergio Perez Gonzalez <sperezglz@...il.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
	Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>,
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@...en8.de>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] slab: Decouple slab_debug and no_hash_pointers

On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 08:24:47AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 04:39:25PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:

...

> As long as it's in -next and scheduled to land, I'm happy. I'd always
> like it earlier, but the less workflow disruption the better! :)

Hmm... The __diag patch series were in Linux Next for a few weeks and did not
land in v6.16-rc1. Just saying that there is always chance to go into cracks.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko