[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aFsL3pJBT6IpYD5M@shikoro>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 22:34:38 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai.xr@...renesas.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/7] i3c: add driver for Renesas I3C IP
> > > There is a specified timeout? I couldn't find one in the specs, can you
> > > kindly point me to it? So, the solution is to use 100us as timeout?
> >
> > See: 5.1.2.5 Controller Clock Stalling
>
> Ah, I missed this one so far. Thanks!
>
> > The spec have not defined what exactly happen if stall clock more than
> > 100us.
>
> I am going to the I3C Plugfest in Warszaw in 10 days. I could ask people
> there...
Well, I also couldn't get an answer here. It seems that part of the
spec has not been excercised a lot so far. The best recommendation was
also to use a timeout < 100us, so that you have a bit of time for
cancelling.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists