[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aGP9ouAP5UFQQn0z@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 17:24:18 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
John Ogness <jogness@...utronix.de>,
David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] printk: ringbuffer: Add KUnit test
On Fri 2025-06-20 12:26:09, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> The KUnit test validates the correct operation of the ringbuffer.
> A separate dedicated ringbuffer is used so that the global printk
> ringbuffer is not touched.
>
> Co-developed-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> Tested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Add comment about possible prb_reserve() failures
> - Pick up tags from Petr
> - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250612-printk-ringbuffer-test-v3-1-550c088ee368@linutronix.de
I have already pushed v3. And I would prefer to avoid a rebase.
I am going to send a patch which will add the comment.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists