[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250717083012.7fea6aba@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 08:30:12 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>, Tamir
Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>, Andy
Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Petr Mladek
<pmladek@...e.com>, "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>, Luis
Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seq_buf: Introduce KUnit tests
On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 01:52:12 -0700
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org> wrote:
> I used an LLM to produce this; it did pretty well, but I had to help it
> get the Kconfig and make targets in the right places, and I tweaked some
> of the edge cases and added a bit more (perhaps redundant) state checking.
This is actually something I think LLMs are good for.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists