[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202508250834.E2456B9@keescook>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:35:14 -0700
From: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...flux.net>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@...nel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] kcfi: Rename CONFIG_CFI_CLANG to CONFIG_CFI
On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 05:01:13PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 4:28 PM Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > -config CFI_CLANG
> > - bool "Use Clang's Control Flow Integrity (CFI)"
> > - depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_CFI_CLANG
> > +config CFI
> > + bool "Use Kernel Control Flow Integrity (kCFI)"
> > + depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_CFI
> > depends on $(cc-option,-fsanitize=kcfi)
> > help
>
> Do we need to do something to make the transition smoother, i.e.
> keeping the old one for a while to avoid a new question etc.?
Yeah, that's a good idea. What the right way to do that?
config CFI_CLANG
bool "Use Clang's Control Flow Integrity (CFI)"
depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_CFI
select CFI
?
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists