[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72mQsLqhpX29NP3Zm8HZ5m429tSXjgFcRYJM3e=Zac1G1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 19:00:22 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...flux.net>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@...nel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] kcfi: Rename CONFIG_CFI_CLANG to CONFIG_CFI
On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 5:35 PM Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Yeah, that's a good idea. What the right way to do that?
>
> config CFI_CLANG
> bool "Use Clang's Control Flow Integrity (CFI)"
> depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_CFI
> select CFI
>
> ?
I don't recall what is the idiomatic solution for renames, but I
remember Linus talking about this topic and about avoiding losing old
values if possible (perhaps getting a new question in `oldconfig` is
OK as long as the `olddefconfig` respects the old value).
I think your suggestion above will still make it appear twice in
`menuconfig` -- there may be a way to play with visibility to make it
better.
A simple possibility I can think of (assuming it works) is having the
CFI symbol for the time being introduced just as a `def_bool
CFI_CLANG` for a few releases so that people get the new one in their
configs.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists