[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aMlH4CcK_n1I1gY2@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 13:20:00 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
Qianqiang Liu <qianqiang.liu@....com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
Shixiong Ou <oushixiong@...inos.cn>,
Zsolt Kajtar <soci@....rulez.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>,
Joel Granados <joel.granados@...nel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Sravan Kumar Gundu <sravankumarlpu@...il.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...cle.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>,
Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@...edance.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Luo Gengkun <luogengkun@...weicloud.com>,
Li Huafei <lihuafei1@...wei.com>,
Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] panic: use panic_try_start() in vpanic()
On Mon 2025-08-25 10:29:33, Jinchao Wang wrote:
> vpanic() had open-coded logic to claim panic_cpu with atomic_try_cmpxchg.
> This is already handled by panic_try_start().
>
> Switch to panic_try_start() and use panic_on_other_cpu() for the fallback
> path.
>
> This removes duplicate code and makes panic handling consistent across
> functions.
>
> --- a/kernel/panic.c
> +++ b/kernel/panic.c
> @@ -415,7 +415,6 @@ void vpanic(const char *fmt, va_list args)
> static char buf[1024];
> long i, i_next = 0, len;
> int state = 0;
> - int old_cpu, this_cpu;
> bool _crash_kexec_post_notifiers = crash_kexec_post_notifiers;
>
> if (panic_on_warn) {
> @@ -452,13 +451,10 @@ void vpanic(const char *fmt, va_list args)
> * `old_cpu == this_cpu' means we came from nmi_panic() which sets
> * panic_cpu to this CPU. In this case, this is also the 1st CPU.
> */
The above comment does not fit any longer. I think that it can
be removed, maybe except for the 1st paragraph.
> - old_cpu = PANIC_CPU_INVALID;
> - this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> -
> /* atomic_try_cmpxchg updates old_cpu on failure */
Also this comment should be removed.
> - if (atomic_try_cmpxchg(&panic_cpu, &old_cpu, this_cpu)) {
> + if (panic_try_start()) {
> /* go ahead */
> - } else if (old_cpu != this_cpu)
> + } else if (panic_on_other_cpu())
> panic_smp_self_stop();
>
> console_verbose();
Otherwise, it looks good. And the comments might be removed
by a followup patch.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists