[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251102151253.GA50752@unreal>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2025 17:12:53 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Alex Williamson <alex@...zbot.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Ankit Agrawal <ankita@...dia.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>,
Shameer Kolothum <skolothumtho@...dia.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Krishnakant Jaju <kjaju@...dia.com>, Matt Ochs <mochs@...dia.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/11] vfio/pci: Add dma-buf export support for MMIO
regions
On Sun, Nov 02, 2025 at 08:01:37AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Nov 2025 10:00:58 +0200
> Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote:
> > @@ -2391,6 +2403,7 @@ static int vfio_pci_dev_set_hot_reset(struct vfio_device_set *dev_set,
> > struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd_ctx)
> > {
> > struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev;
> > + bool restore_revoke = false;
> > struct pci_dev *pdev;
> > int ret;
> >
> > @@ -2459,6 +2472,8 @@ static int vfio_pci_dev_set_hot_reset(struct vfio_device_set *dev_set,
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, true);
> > + restore_revoke = true;
> > vfio_pci_zap_bars(vdev);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2486,6 +2501,12 @@ static int vfio_pci_dev_set_hot_reset(struct vfio_device_set *dev_set,
> > struct vfio_pci_core_device, vdev.dev_set_list);
> >
> > err_undo:
> > + if (restore_revoke) {
> > + list_for_each_entry(vdev, &dev_set->device_list, vdev.dev_set_list)
> > + if (__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev))
> > + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, false);
> > + }
> > +
> > list_for_each_entry_from_reverse(vdev, &dev_set->device_list,
> > vdev.dev_set_list)
>
> We don't need the separate loop or flag, and adding it breaks the
> existing reverse list walk. Thanks,
Do you want me to send v7? I have a feeling that v6 is good to be merged.
Thanks
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
index 24204893e221..51a3bcc26f8b 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
@@ -2403,7 +2403,6 @@ static int vfio_pci_dev_set_hot_reset(struct vfio_device_set *dev_set,
struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd_ctx)
{
struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev;
- bool restore_revoke = false;
struct pci_dev *pdev;
int ret;
@@ -2473,7 +2472,6 @@ static int vfio_pci_dev_set_hot_reset(struct vfio_device_set *dev_set,
}
vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, true);
- restore_revoke = true;
vfio_pci_zap_bars(vdev);
}
@@ -2501,15 +2499,12 @@ static int vfio_pci_dev_set_hot_reset(struct vfio_device_set *dev_set,
struct vfio_pci_core_device, vdev.dev_set_list);
err_undo:
- if (restore_revoke) {
- list_for_each_entry(vdev, &dev_set->device_list, vdev.dev_set_list)
- if (__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev))
- vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, false);
- }
-
list_for_each_entry_from_reverse(vdev, &dev_set->device_list,
- vdev.dev_set_list)
+ vdev.dev_set_list) {
+ if (__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev))
+ vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, false);
up_write(&vdev->memory_lock);
+ }
list_for_each_entry(vdev, &dev_set->device_list, vdev.dev_set_list)
pm_runtime_put(&vdev->pdev->dev);
>
> Alex
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists