lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <032ef71c-fcbd-42a9-98ea-b2568d663978@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 13:03:56 +0100
From: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...nel.org>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil+cisco@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
 Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@...il.com>, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...nel.org>,
 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
 Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>,
 Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] module: Add compile-time check for embedded NUL
 characters



On 04/11/2025 11.35, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 04/11/2025 07:35, Daniel Gomez wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/11/2025 01.13, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 08:49:43PM +0100, Daniel Gomez wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 09 Oct 2025 20:06:06 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>>>  v2:
>>>>>  - use static_assert instead of _Static_assert
>>>>>  - add Hans's Reviewed-by's
>>>>>  v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251008033844.work.801-kees@kernel.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> Applied patch 3, thanks!
>>>>
>>>> [3/3] module: Add compile-time check for embedded NUL characters
>>>>       commit: 913359754ea821c4d6f6a77e0449b29984099663
>>>
>>> I'm nervous about this going in alone -- it breaks allmodconfig builds
>>> without the media fixes. My intention was to have the media fixes land
>>> first...
>>>
>>> Should I send the media fixes to linus right away?
>>>
>>> -Kees
>>>
>>
>> I can take both patches. But I think it'd make sense to drop patch 3 first and
>> then, apply all 3.
>>
>> Please, Kees, Hans and Mauro, let me know if this is okay with you.
> 
> I'm fine. If you take it, then I'll drop the media patches from our tree (I merged the
> media patches yesterday).
> 
> Let me know if you take them.

Thanks, Hans. I merged patch 3 yesterday as well, but since patch order matters
in this case, it makes sense to take all of them through the modules tree.

Sorry for the trouble, and thanks Kees, for pointing this out.

> 
> Regards,
> 
> 	Hans

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ