[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aW_4bxkLe4-g9teu@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 23:49:35 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@...dex.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
Carlos Maiolino <cem@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] xfs: adjust handling of a few numerical mount
options
On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 07:57:50PM +0300, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> On Tue, 2026-01-20 at 16:59 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> > With all this, I do not see the point of having a new API.
> > Also, where are the test cases for it?
> If there is no point, why worrying about tests?
I don't know yet if there is a point or not, I provided my view.
I think you know better than me the code in question. It might
be that I'm mistaken, and if so the good justification in the
(currently absent) cover letter may well help with that.
> Also, do you always communicate with the people
> just like they're your (well-) paid personnel?
What do you mean? Test cases is the requirement for the new APIs
added to the lib/. It's really should be regular practice for
the code development independently on the project. If you think
frustrated by this, I can tell you that I was more than once in
the past in the same situation until I learnt it very well and
now when I submit anything to the lib I always add test cases.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists