linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] lib and lib/cmdline enhancements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aXeZ8Wx3YGBe666p@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 18:44:33 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@...dex.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
	"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] lib and lib/cmdline enhancements

On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 06:43:19PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 07:20:56PM +0300, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> > Adjust '_parse_integer_limit()' to not ignore overflows, add KUnit-based
> > test for 'memparse()' and fix kernel-doc glitches found in lib/cmdline.c.
> 
> Shouldn't we also add test cases to lib/test-kstrtox.c?

Actually I think some of what you added for memparse(), should be moved to
test-kstrtox.c as they test the beneath implementation rather than memparse()
added code.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko