linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH v4] Fix sanitizer attribute infrastructure to use standard TREE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202602061016.DD543146B8@keescook>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 10:16:34 -0800
From: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Pinski <andrew.pinski@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@...cle.com>,
	Claudiu Zissulescu <claudiu.zissulescu-ianculescu@...cle.com>,
	Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@...cle.com>, gcc-patches@....gnu.org,
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Fix sanitizer attribute infrastructure to use
 standard TREE_LIST format [PR113264]

On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 12:05:04AM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 10:43 AM Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > The __attribute__((__copy__)) functionality was crashing when copying
> > sanitizer-related attributes because these attributes violated the standard
> > GCC attribute infrastructure by storing INTEGER_CST values directly instead
> > of wrapping them in TREE_LIST like all other attributes.
> 
> I am going to review this over the weekend. I see it was not reviewed yet.

Thanks! I'd love to get this landed (I don't have commit access).

-- 
Kees Cook