[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aZbIpCSuKU45b66t@stanley.mountain>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 11:24:04 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@...il.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
Jan Hendrik Farr <kernel@...rr.cc>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] slab: Introduce kmalloc_obj() and family
On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 11:01:04AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2025 at 03:30:31PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Introduce type-aware kmalloc-family helpers to replace the common
> > idioms for single object and arrays of objects allocation:
> >
> > ptr = kmalloc(sizeof(*ptr), gfp);
> > ptr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct some_obj_name), gfp);
> > ptr = kzalloc(sizeof(*ptr), gfp);
> > ptr = kmalloc_array(count, sizeof(*ptr), gfp);
> > ptr = kcalloc(count, sizeof(*ptr), gfp);
> >
> > These become, respectively:
> >
> > ptr = kmalloc_obj(*ptr, gfp);
>
> We are already getting patches that covert these to:
>
> ptr = kmalloc_obj(ptr, gfp);
>
> (without the *). This feels like the obvious bug people will introduce
> with this API. I sort of think that "ptr = kmalloc_obj(ptr, gfp);" is
> more natural, so maybe we could make it work that way instead?
Never mind. It causes a compile error when people leave out the
asterisk. Thanks for that.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists