[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200607141000_MC3-1-C4FF-945F@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 09:57:54 -0400
From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-pci <linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, "Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
Rajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch, take 3] PCI: use ACPI to verify extended config
space on x86
In-Reply-To: <1152869988.3159.25.camel@...topd505.fenrus.org>
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 11:39:48 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > Extend the verification for PCI-X/PCI-Express extended config
> > space pointer. Checks whether the MCFG address range is listed
> > as a motherboard resource, per the PCI firmware spec.
>
> I'm still not quite happy about this; the entire point of the check is
> that we CAN'T trust the ACPI implementation, and want a second opinion.
> This patch basically asks the ACPI implementation if we can trust the
> ACPI implementation. I'm not sure that's a good idea.
> And I understood that most issues went away with the more relaxed check
> that is in gregkh's tree already (if not in mainline, I should check
> that).
The more-relaxed check is in mainline. I wrote it, but it didn't even
fix the problem on my own machine. This did.
According to Rajesh, the spec doesn't require the MCFG space to be
e820-reserved, so that's not really a valid check.
--
Chuck
"You can't read a newspaper if you can't read." --George W. Bush
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists