[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m17j2gw76o.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 09:13:35 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
Cedric Le Goater <clg@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Kirill Korotaev <dev@...nvz.org>, Andrey Savochkin <saw@...ru>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>,
Sam Vilain <sam.vilain@...alyst.net.nz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 5/7] add user namespace
Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com> writes:
> On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 21:45 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> I think for filesystems like /proc and /sys that there will normally
>> be problems. However many of those problems can be rationalized away
>> as a reasonable optimization, or are not immediately apparent.
>
> Could you talk about some of these problems?
Already mentioned but. rw permissions on sensitive files are for
uid == 0. No capability checks are performed.
>> Passing a file descriptor between process in a unix domain socket is
>> a case where I can easily construct scenarios where there are
>> indisputable problems. It is one of my standard thought experiments
>> to see if a namespace is sound.
>
> Care to share some of those indisputable problems?
Already done.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists