[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1152998347.3114.36.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 23:19:06 +0200
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Albert Cahalan <acahalan@...il.com>
Cc: dwmw2@...radead.org, maillist@...55.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: 2.6.18 Headers - Long
On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 17:09 -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> David Woodhouse writes:
>
> > Kernel headers are _not_ a library of random crap for userspace to use.
>
> The attraction is that the kernel abstractions are very nice.
> Much of the POSIX API sucks ass. The kernel stuff is NOT crap.
>
> Here we have a full-featured set of atomic ops,
which are not atomic actually in userspace (hint: most apps don't have
CONFIG_SMP set)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists