[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1152971896.16617.4.camel@mindpipe>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 09:58:15 -0400
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@...-job.com>
To: Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin@...erbrooke.ca>
Cc: Esben Nielsen <nielsen.esben@...glemail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: Where is RLIMIT_RT_CPU?
On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 09:20 +1000, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> > Can't you just make a prio 1 task which signals a prio 99 once say every
> > second. If the priority 99 task doesn't get the signal after say 2
> > seconds, it will look for a rt task running wild. At worst it will have to do
> > an O(n) algorith when things have gone wrong, not when everything is
> > working.
>
> Well, that would work in sort of preventing a complete lockup, but the
> watchdog wouldn't even know if the task eating lots of CPU is privileged
> (OK) or unprivileged (not OK). Also, the original RLIMIT_RT_CPU feature
> allowed you to really control how much CPU is available to unprivileged
> users, not just prevent them from getting 100% CPU.
Non-root RT tasks are not "unprivileged" - they have a level of
privileges between a normal user and root. Really I think it's OK for
these tasks to consume 100% CPU, as the admin has explicitly allowed it.
The only problem is that Ubuntu shipped with this enabled for everyone.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists