linux-kernel - Re: tighten ATA kconfig dependancies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1153029887.3033.7.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date:	Sun, 16 Jul 2006 08:04:47 +0200
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	7eggert@....de, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: tighten ATA kconfig dependancies


> A cross compile toolchain is the only real soluion. Otherwise we would
> soon end up with far to many drivers selectable for x84-64.

if the *driver* is not platform specific, what is the problem with that?
Aunt Tilly again? The only difference between x86 and x86-64 is isa-bus
cards and things that were put on a motherboard but never on a PCI card.
That's maybe a dozen or two total for the entire kernel, and a set that
is not growing.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/