[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200607161029.48628@strip-the-willow>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 10:29:48 +0100
From: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: akpm@...l.org, davem@...emloft.net, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org, kaber@...eworks.de,
pekkas@...core.fi, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2.6.18-rc1-mm2 1/3] net: UDP-Lite generic support
Quoting Herbert Xu:
| > case SO_NO_CHECK:
| > - sk->sk_no_check = valbool;
| > + /* UDP-Lite (RFC 3828) mandates checksumming,
| > + * hence user must not enable this option. */
| > + if (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_UDPLITE)
| > + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
| > + else
| > + sk->sk_no_check = valbool;
|
| Please don't add protocol-specific stuff to generic functions. In this
| case why don't you just ignore sk_no_check for UDPLITE as we do for TCP?
Thank you for spotting this -- the UDP-Lite code indeed ignores sk_no_check
and will (if no socket options are set) emulate UDP with sk_no_check = 0. Setting
it to 1 will make no difference; so the above is more not strictly necessary. Will
remove in next patch.
Any other comments or ideas, please do not hesitate to write.
-- Gerrit
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists