[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1153099599.3150.0.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 03:26:18 +0200
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Albert Cahalan <acahalan@...il.com>
Cc: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>, dwmw2@...radead.org,
maillist@...55.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: 2.6.18 Headers - Long
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 15:22 -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> On 7/16/06, Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 02:38:45PM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> > > On 7/16/06, Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com> wrote:
> > > >On Jul 15, 2006, at 17:09:28, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> > >
> > > >You realize that on a couple architectures it's fundamentally
> > > >impossible to get atomic ops completely in userspace, right?
> > >
> > > Sure. Those architectures don't need to drag down the rest.
> > > Plenty of headers are only exported for some architectures.
> >
> > Wrong perspective. The problem is that they may _appear_ to work as
> > described, but not actually work in the intended way. That's a bug,
> > and it's a _hard_ bug to locate.
>
> Again:
>
> Plenty of headers are only exported for some architectures.
and guess what... atomic.h does not work on i386, at least it doesn't
provide atomic access in userspace!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists