linux-kernel - Re: [patch 03/45] x86_64: Fix modular pc speaker

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d120d5000607171102g5703d546q6768ccdbd8acc97e@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:02:34 -0400
From:	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	"Greg KH" <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	"Justin Forbes" <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
	"Zwane Mwaikambo" <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	"Dave Jones" <davej@...hat.com>,
	"Chuck Wolber" <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
	"Chris Wedgwood" <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>, torvalds@...l.org,
	akpm@...l.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, "Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>,
	"Chris Wright" <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 03/45] x86_64: Fix modular pc speaker

On 7/17/06, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
>
> ------------------
> It turned out that the following change is needed when the speaker is
> compiled as a module.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
> ---
>  arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- linux-2.6.17.2.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c
> +++ linux-2.6.17.2/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -1440,7 +1440,7 @@ struct seq_operations cpuinfo_op = {
>        .show = show_cpuinfo,
>  };
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_INPUT_PCSPKR
> +#if defined(CONFIG_INPUT_PCSPKR) || defined(CONFIG_INPUT_PCSPKR_MODULE)
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  static __init int add_pcspkr(void)
>  {

Why have this #ifdefed at all? The device is there regardless of
whether PCSPKR driver is selected and teoretically one could use an
alternative driver to speak to the hardware or decide to add pcspkr
driver later.

-- 
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/