lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44BC0E8F.2090504@edsons.demon.nl>
Date:	Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:26:23 +0200
From:	Rudy Zijlstra <rudy@...ons.demon.nl>
To:	Hans Reiser <reiser@...esys.com>
CC:	Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>, 7eggert@....de,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@...esys.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reiserfs: fix handling of device names with /'s in them

Hans Reiser wrote:

>Jeff Mahoney wrote:
>
>  
>
><snip>
>  
>

>so why did you take their stable branch away from them by working on
>more than bugfixes for V3?
>
>Jeff, working on v3 at this point is nuts.  V4 blows it away....
>  
>
Hans,

I appreciate your vision and willingness to work to that vision.

The above though, is pure and simple PR. Please do not confuse PR with 
maintenance, or design maintenance.

I run pretty recent kernels on some of my servers and or workstations 
(2.6.17.4 at the moment). Some others are still using 2.4. All of them 
are using reiserfs3. I use reiser3 for most all, except video 
application partitions where XFS is used. For the past 2 yr i have been 
really pressed for time, and as a result have needed to scale back on 
pet projects, like testing new filesystems which are not yet into 
mainline. Once Reiserfs4 gets into mainline, i will test on a 
workstation. Till that time (and after) any work done on reiserfs3 is 
very much appreciated by me. It is keeping v3 up with changing 
requirements and expectations.

You cannot start developing a new version and then quit supporting the 
previous version. I consider the work Jeff and others have been doing a 
very good maintenance job. YES, a maintenance job. Addition of 
relatively minor features is part of normal maintenance.

I expect you to disagree here, i am used to that (having followed 
reiserfs list for many years).


Cheers,


Rudy Zijlstra

P.S. reducing maintenance to pure bug-fixing is tentamount to announcing 
EOL.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ