lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060717072457.GA12215@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de>
Date:	Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:24:57 +0200
From:	Andreas Mohr <andi@...x01.fht-esslingen.de>
To:	Vikas Kedia <kedia.vikas@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel panic at load average of 24 is it acceptable ?

Hi,

On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 12:08:41AM -0700, Vikas Kedia wrote:
> The memtest ran fine for 8 hours:
> http://www.visitlab.com/styles/basic/images/memtest.JPG
> 
> My questions are:
> 1. Kernel panic at load average of 24 is it acceptable ?

Kernel panic is _NEVER_ acceptable.
I've seen loads in the couple hundreds with no problem.

However you actually have a mce_panic() crash here.
Make sure to figure out why this Machine Check Exception got raised,
otherwise you might hose the box if you continue without investigation.
It could easily be due to mal-working CPU fan etc.pp., especially since it
happened exactly while you stress-tested the machine.

> 2. If not how do I go about debugging this kernel panic ?

Read up on MCE debugging methods on Linux or so, that should hopefully help.

Good luck!

Andreas Mohr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ