[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200607171424.49827.a1426z@gawab.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:24:49 +0300
From: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 2.6.18-rc2] [2/8] i386/x86-64: Don't randomize stack top when no randomization personality
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
> > unsigned long arch_align_stack(unsigned long sp)
> > {
> > - if (randomize_va_space)
> > + if (!(current->personality & ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) &&
> > randomize_va_space) sp -= get_random_int() % 8192;
> > return sp & ~0xf;
>
> i'm not opposing this patch at all, but didnt the performance problems
> go away when the 0xf was changed to 0x7f?
Yes, 0x7f is critical, but I'm not sure about side-effects.
> looks good otherwise.
except this one
> --- linux.orig/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> +++ linux/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> @@ -515,7 +515,8 @@ static unsigned long randomize_stack_top
> {
> unsigned int random_variable = 0;
>
> - if (current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE) {
> + if ((current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE) &&
> + !(current->personality & ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE)) {
> random_variable = get_random_int() & STACK_RND_MASK;
> random_variable <<= PAGE_SHIFT;
> }
Why are you testing twice?
Thanks!
--
Al
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists