[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0607171631460.5733@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:33:47 +0200 (MEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "Why Reuser 4 still is not in" doc
>
>Using this as an argument against plug-ins is a bit strange. I suppose
>somebody could go overboard and use plug-ins to implement a subKernel.
>Would this then imply that plug-ins are wrong?
>
Ok, I've read some other threads too and so this claim should be adjusted:
Writing a plugin (not necessarily r4 specific) that changes the semantics
of objects based on context (i.e. turning a file into a dir) is a bad idea
IMHO.
Actually, BSD has this double-semantic to a limited degree: you can call
`/usr/bin/vi /usr/bin` and get some binary representation of readdir.
Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists