lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9il8k$n71$1@news.cistron.nl>
Date:	Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:47:16 +0000 (UTC)
From:	Paul Slootman <paul+nospam@...tel.net>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:  Re: [PATCH] SCSI disk won't spinup, so boot hangs

Erik Mouw  <erik@...ddisk-recovery.com> wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 04:14:41PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
>> I was recently confronted by a SCSI disk that had crashed somehow
>> ("mechanical positioning error" during the first signs of trouble). The
>> kernel hung after that, despite the fact that everything was on RAID-1
>> and the first disk still was working...
>
>Sounds like a worn bearing or a head crash.

Probably a head crash, this was a 5 month old 15krpm 73GB scsi disk.

>> I reasoned that if the spinup fails, it doesn't make much sense to try
>> and read the capacity, the partition tables, etc..  Hence I came up with
>> the patch below that sets media_present to 0 when the spinup doesn't
>> respond. It works for me (TM); there may be a better way, however the
>> current behaviour sucks big time.
>
>I've seen disks where the 100s timeout is not enough and which only
>came into a useful state after 10 minutes or even longer. Your patch

I'd consider disks that take 10 minutes or more to become ready
extremely obsolete :-)

>would make those disks useless, even though they can be used. Also I'm

Not really, wait your 10 minutes, echo "scsi remove-single-device a b c
d" > /proc/scsi/scsi; echo "scsi add-single-device a b c d" >
/proc/scsi/scsi; and there it is.

>not sure your patch is the right approach: a disk doesn't have
>removable media and yet it reports that there's no media present.

For all intents and purposes, the media isn't there...
Do you really think that the current behaviour (wait until eternity for
the drive to become ready on read capacity) to be the correct behaviour?
If so, why bother with the delay (of max. 100s) until spinup? Simply
issue the spinup command, and start trying to read the capacity would be
enough then.


Paul Slootman

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ