linux-kernel - Re: [discuss] [PATCH 1/2] x86_64: Calgary IOMMU - Multi-Node NULL pointer dereference fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060718140906.GA10011@rhun.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:09:06 +0300
From:	Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc:	discuss@...-64.org, Jon Mason <jdmason@...ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, konradr@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [discuss] [PATCH 1/2] x86_64: Calgary IOMMU - Multi-Node NULL pointer dereference fix

On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 03:50:57PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 July 2006 01:18, Jon Mason wrote:
> > Hey Andi,
> >
> > Calgary hits a NULL pointer dereference when booting in a multi-chassis
> > NUMA system.  See Redhat bugzilla number 198498, found by Konrad
> > Rzeszutek (konradr@...hat.com).
> 
> The patch doesn't apply at all to rc2.
>
> Also where is 2/2 ? I only see 1/2 

Hmpf, there were two Calgary patches, both mistakenly labeled
1/2. This is actually the second one. When applied in order, both
apply to today's head.

Sorry about the confusion, please let us know if you want a resend. I
guess Jon got a smidgen too excited about OLS :-)

Cheers,
Muli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/