[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060718184052.GA9679@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:40:52 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: febo@...enda.net
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 'vintage' via dma bug
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 08:36:00PM +0200, febo@...enda.net wrote:
> I have the misfortune to run a rather old PIII machine with a VIA chipset,
> a Fedora Core 1 distro with 2.4.22 kernel and two PATA hard mirrored hard
> disk, on two separate channels, both set to primary. I've experienced some
> data corruption lately and after much googling I've found that 4-5 years
> ago some via chipset experienced a similar problem with dma transfers,
> especially with hard disk configured the very same way as my setup. The bug
> was fixed, I gather, in 2.4.4. I've upgrade the kernel to 2.6.10 (the
> latest Fedora legacy core *TWO* kernel, with fingers crossed) but the
> corruption problems usually start to pop up only after a few weeks of
> uptime, especially under relatively heavy load.
> I couldn't find more precise pointers after all these years so I'd like to
> know if that bug really affected my chipset, and if 2.6.10 is a valid
> solution..
I'm puzzled why you upgraded from one end-of-life'd distro to
another ancient end-of-life'd distro. You're more likely to get
interest from the upstream developers if you're running
something recent. Even _I_ don't remember what was good/bad
in the Fedora kernels from that era, and I built them :-)
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists