lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060718192925.GC2654@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date:	Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:29:25 -0700
From:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.osdl.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
	Ian Pratt <ian.pratt@...source.com>,
	Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@...cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/33] Add apply_to_page_range() function

* Adrian Bunk (bunk@...sta.de) wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 12:00:01AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> >...
> > --- a/mm/memory.c	Fri Mar 24 04:29:46 2006 +0000
> > +++ b/mm/memory.c	Fri Mar 24 04:30:48 2006 +0000
> > @@ -1358,6 +1358,100 @@ int remap_pfn_range(struct vm_area_struc
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(remap_pfn_range);
> >  
> > +static inline int apply_to_pte_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
> > +				     unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> > +				     pte_fn_t fn, void *data)
> >...
> > +static inline int apply_to_pmd_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud,
> > +				     unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> > +				     pte_fn_t fn, void *data)
> >...
> > +static inline int apply_to_pud_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd,
> > +				     unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> > +				     pte_fn_t fn, void *data)
> >...
> 
> Please avoid "inline" in C files.
> 
> (gcc already automatically inlines static functions with only one caller.)

Sure, that's fair.  The surrounding similar code follows the same format 
as above, perhaps you plan to patch?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ