[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060718210025.GE2654@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:00:25 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: zach@...are.com, arjan@...radead.org, chrisw@...s-sol.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, jeremy@...p.org, ak@...e.de,
akpm@...l.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, ian.pratt@...source.com,
Christian.Limpach@...cam.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 18/33] Subarch support for CPUID instruction
* David Miller (davem@...emloft.net) wrote:
> From: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 04:33:52 -0700
>
> > You really need a CPUID hook. The instruction is non-virtualizable, and
> > anything claiming to be a hypervisor really has to support masking and
> > flattening the cpuid namespace for the instruction itself. It is used
> > in assembler code and very early in boot. The alternative is injecting
> > a bunch of Xen-specific code to filter feature bits into the i386 layer,
> > which is both bad for Linux and bad for Xen - and was quite ugly in the
> > last set of Xen patches.
>
> Userspace will still see the full set of cpuid bits, since
> it can still execute cpuid unimpeded, is this ok?
Yup, it's for the kernel (things like systenter vs int 80 in vdso).
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists