linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] panic_on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:23:41 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	Horms <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc:	ak@...e.de, rmk@....linux.org.uk, tony.luck@...el.com,
	paulus@...ba.org, anton@...ba.org, chris@...kel.net,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	discuss@...-64.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] panic_on_oops: remove ssleep()

On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:10:59 -0400
Horms <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 12:27:51AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Monday 17 July 2006 18:17, Horms wrote:
> > ...
> > Keeping the delay might be actually useful so that you can see the panic
> > before system reboots when reboot on panic is enabled. I would just use a loop
> > of mdelays(1) with touch_nmi_watchdog/touch_softirq_watchdog()s
> > inbetween.
> 
> Ok, I will look into making that happen. I agree that the pause is
> quite useful.

It's kind-of already implemented, via pause_on_oops.  Perhaps doing
something like 

	if (panic_on_oops)
		pause_on_oops = max(pause_on_oops, 5*HZ);

would be sufficient.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/