[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1153216601.3038.16.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:56:41 +0200
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Ian Pratt <ian.pratt@...source.com>,
Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@...cam.ac.uk>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/33] Add sync bitops
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 00:00 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> plain text document attachment (synch-ops)
> Add "always lock'd" implementations of set_bit, clear_bit and
> change_bit and the corresponding test_and_ functions. Also add
> "always lock'd" implementation of cmpxchg. These give guaranteed
> strong synchronisation and are required for non-SMP kernels running on
> an SMP hypervisor.
Hi,
this sounds really like the wrong approach; you know you're compiling
for xen, so why not just make set_bit() and the others use the lock'd
instructions at compile time?
Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists