[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1153217033.3038.25.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:03:53 +0200
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Ian Pratt <ian.pratt@...source.com>,
Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@...cam.ac.uk>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/33] Add start-of-day setup hooks to subarch
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 00:00 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> plain text document attachment (i386-setup)
> Implement the start-of-day subarchitecture setup hooks for booting on
> Xen. Add subarch macros for determining loader type and initrd
> location.
> diff -r a5848bce3730 arch/i386/kernel/setup.c
> --- a/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c Thu Jun 22 16:02:54 2006 -0400
> +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c Thu Jun 22 20:20:31 2006 -0400
> @@ -458,6 +458,7 @@ static void __init print_memory_map(char
> }
> }
>
> +#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_E820_SANITIZE
> /*
> * Sanitize the BIOS e820 map.
> *
> @@ -677,6 +678,7 @@ int __init copy_e820_map(struct e820entr
> } while (biosmap++,--nr_map);
> return 0;
> }
> +#endif
>
Hi,
what is this for? Isn't this 1) undocumented and 2) unclear and 3)
ugly ? (I'm pretty sure the HAVE_ARCH_* stuff is highly deprecated for
new things nowadays)
Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists