[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1153217686.3038.37.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:14:46 +0200
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Ian Pratt <ian.pratt@...source.com>,
Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@...cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 18/33] Subarch support for CPUID instruction
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 00:00 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> plain text document attachment (i386-cpuid)
> Allow subarchitectures to modify the CPUID instruction. This allows
> the subarch to provide a limited set of CPUID feature flags during CPU
> identification. Add a subarch implementation for Xen that traps to the
> hypervisor where unsupported feature flags can be hidden from guests.
Hi,
I'm wondering if this is entirely the wrong level of abstraction; to me
it feels the subarch shouldn't override the actual cpuid, but the cpu
feature flags that linux uses. That's a lot less messy: cpuid has many
many pieces of information which are near impossible to filter in
practice, however filtering the USAGE of it is trivial; linux basically
flattens the cpuid namespace into a simple bitmap of "what the kernel
can use". That is really what the subarch should filter/fixup, just like
we do for cpu quirks etc etc.
Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists