linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 32/33] Add the Xen virtual network device driver.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1153218477.3038.46.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date:	Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:27:57 +0200
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
	xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
	Ian Pratt <ian.pratt@...source.com>,
	Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@...cam.ac.uk>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 32/33] Add the Xen virtual network device driver.

On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 00:00 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> +
> +/** Send a packet on a net device to encourage switches to learn the
> + * MAC. We send a fake ARP request.
> + *
> + * @param dev device
> + * @return 0 on success, error code otherwise
> + */
> +static int send_fake_arp(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> +	u32             src_ip, dst_ip;
> +
> +	dst_ip = INADDR_BROADCAST;
> +	src_ip = inet_select_addr(dev, dst_ip, RT_SCOPE_LINK);
> +
> +	/* No IP? Then nothing to do. */
> +	if (src_ip == 0)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	skb = arp_create(ARPOP_REPLY, ETH_P_ARP,
> +			 dst_ip, dev, src_ip,
> +			 /*dst_hw*/ NULL, /*src_hw*/ NULL,
> +			 /*target_hw*/ dev->dev_addr);
> +	if (skb == NULL)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	return dev_queue_xmit(skb);
> +}

Hi,

Hmmm maybe it's me, but something bugs me if a NIC driver is going to
send IP level ARP packets... that just feels very very wrong and is a
blatant layering violation.... shouldn't the ifup/ifconfig scripts just
be fixed instead if this is critical behavior?

Greetings,
   Arjan van de Ven



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/