[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d120d5000607191317k2e773af3ta5034a37db5ad97d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:17:38 -0400
From: "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: "Roman Zippel" <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Using select in boolean dependents of a tristate symbol
On 7/14/06, Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> What you could do is to use "select INPUT_FF_MEMLESS if HID" to make it
> visible that this dependency is actually for select.
> This point is a little subtle and I'm not completely happy with it, maybe
> I'm going to split this into two select variations - one which includes
> all the dependencies and one which only uses the config symbol to select.
>
Roman,
Another question for you - what is the best way to describe
dependancy of a sub-option on a subsystem so you won't end up with the
subsystem as a module and user built in. Something like
config IBM_ASM
tristate "Device driver for IBM RSA service processor"
depends on X86 && PCI && EXPERIMENTAL
...
config IBM_ASM_INPUT
bool "Support for remote keyboard/mouse"
depends on IBM_ASM && (INPUT=y || INPUT=IMB_ASM)
But the above feels yucky. Could we have something like:
depends on matching(INPUT, IBM_ASM)
Thank you.
--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists