lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bda6d13a0607202234xc7d58a1t2a440c8458596582@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Jul 2006 22:34:08 -0700
From:	"Joshua Hudson" <joshudson@...il.com>
To:	"Irfan Habib" <irfan.habib@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: why is intercepting system calls considerred bad?

On 7/20/06, Irfan Habib <irfan.habib@...il.com> wrote:
> HI,
>
> I recently met a kernel janitor, who told me that intercepting system
> calls is undesirable, why?

I'll bite.

You intercept. Somebody else intercepts. You want to stop intercepting.

For this reason, anybody who intercepts a system call must be compiled
in, and if two intercept the same system call, than the link order
dictates behavior.

Obviously not desirable.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ