[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44C0B439.8020604@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:02:17 +0200
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...Helsinki.FI>
CC: Panagiotis Issaris <takis@....org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de>,
Panagiotis Issaris <takis@...umba.uhasselt.be>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, len.brown@...el.com,
chas@....nrl.navy.mil, miquel@...uba.ar, kkeil@...e.de,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, video4linux-list@...hat.com,
rmk+mmc@....linux.org.uk, Neela.Kolli@...enio.com,
vandrove@...cvut.cz, adaplas@....net, thomas@...ischhofer.net,
weissg@...nna.at, philb@....org, linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org,
jkmaline@...hut.fi, paulus@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: Conversions from kmalloc+memset tok(z|c)alloc.
Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> At least Andrew seems to prefer cleaning up in the same patch. Anyway, I
> don't think Jeff meant that you shouldn't do any cleanups, but that you
> should try to respect the existing style as much possible.
First and foremost, respect that the Linux sources need to have a
minimum level of stylistic uniformity.
> There are
> things that are almost generally agreed upon, such as removal of redundant
> typecasts, redundant wrappers, and moving assignment out of if statement
> expression. Formatting and the dreaded sizeof thing, however,
> are not, so it is best to keep them as-is.
Contributors can't know what the (supposed) _agreements_ are.
Contributors can only know what the _documented conventions_ are.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-==- -=== =--==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists