linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 3)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 22 Jul 2006 19:08:48 +0200
From:	ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se
To:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	Vadim Lobanov <vlobanov@...akeasy.net>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
	Shorty Porty <getshorty_@...mail.com>,
	Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
	Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 3)

Citerar Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>:

> ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se wrote:
> > * changed back the version-checking when defining bool, this since I'm
> quite
> > sure Linux 2.4 and 2.6 share (if not all, then large part of) the drivers.
> And
> > 2.4 is still compiled with the 2.95 Gcc.
> 
> Drivers in 2.4 and 2.6 differ. We don't put 2.4-compatibility code into 
> 2.6. And the bool type won't get into 2.4.

It doesn't?! Good, that simplify it to only a:
typedef _Bool bool;
line. Did googled on it but did not find anything that comfirmed or denied it.
Thanks

> -- 
> Stefan Richter

/Richard Knutsson

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/