[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1153530447.22255@shark.he.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:07:27 -0700
From: "Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To: David Lang <dlang@...italinsight.com>,
Matt LaPlante <kernel1@...erdogtech.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How long to wait on patches?
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Matt LaPlante wrote:
>
> > I checked the FAQ but didn't see an answer to this. Over the past
few weeks
> > I've submitted probably around 8 simple typo-fix patches all of
which seemed
> > to be approved by others on the list. I've been following the GIT,
but these
> > patches haven't been merged yet. I know people are busy with other
things,
> > probably more important, but I would like to know how long is
"acceptable" to
> > wait before I should re-submit a patch. Obviously if enough time
passes,
> > patches start to break as source files change. I don't mean to be a
nuisance;
> > I'm just trying to determine proper protocol. That and the fact I
can submit
> > several more patches once I get some of these old ones out of my
queue. :)
>
> be sure to watch the -mm tree as well, a lot of patches are picked up
by Andrew
> to be fed to Linus that way
>
> this is a particularly bad week since almost all the core developers
were up at
> OLS.
>
> one thing you may want to look at doing (hosting permitting) is to
setup a git
> tree to just hold your trivial patches so that they can be pulled easily.
>
> I thought there was a person who was maintaining a -trivial tree for this
> purpose, I don't remember who it was though.
Yes, Adrian Bunk accepts and forwards trivial patches. See
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/bunk/trivial/
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists