[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44C1C3BC.606@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 08:20:44 +0200
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
CC: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de>,
Panagiotis Issaris <takis@...umba.uhasselt.be>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, len.brown@...el.com,
chas@....nrl.navy.mil, miquel@...uba.ar, kkeil@...e.de,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, video4linux-list@...hat.com,
rmk+mmc@....linux.org.uk, Neela.Kolli@...enio.com,
vandrove@...cvut.cz, adaplas@....net, thomas@...ischhofer.net,
weissg@...nna.at, philb@....org, linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org,
jkmaline@...hut.fi, paulus@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: Conversions from kmalloc+memset to k(z|c)alloc.
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> The patch should contain ONE logical change.
Definitely yes. The problem is to figure out what "one" is.
I already posted what I considered one logical change in this case and
why I did: It's an idiomatic makeover of k*alloc calls without change in
functionality. What breaks my counting of "one" is that unwritten rules
about preferred idioms (are said to) override written rules.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-==- -=== =-==-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists