[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060722223425.c94a858e.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 22:34:25 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Cc: davej@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ashok.raj@...el.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: remove cpu hotplug bustification in cpufreq.
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:15:32 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > It was just wrong in conception. We should not and probably cannot fix it.
> > Let's just delete it all, then implement version 2.
>
> Well, I just got Ashok's trial patches which turns the thing into a rwsem
> as I outlined earlier.
Mark my words ;)
> I'll try them out. If they don't work, we should just delete the lock and
> go totally back to square 1.
rwsem conversion has the potential to merely hide the problem. Ingo, does
lockdep detect recursive down_read()?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists