lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060723162427.GA10553@osiris.ibm.com>
Date:	Sun, 23 Jul 2006 18:24:27 +0200
From:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [patch] slab: always follow arch requested alignments

On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 06:03:09AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > See kmem_cache_create():
> > >       /* 2) arch mandated alignment: disables debug if necessary */
> > >         if (ralign < ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN) {
> > >                 ralign = ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN;
> > >                 if (ralign > BYTES_PER_WORD)
> > >                         flags &= ~(SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_STORE_USER);
> > >         }
> > 
> > That is because if kmem_cache_create gets called with SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN set
> > in flags then ralign will be greater or equal to ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN:
> > 
> >         /* 1) arch recommendation: can be overridden for debug */ 
> >         if (flags & SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN) { 
> > 	        [...]
> >                 ralign = cache_line_size(); 
> > 	        [...]
> 
> Ok. Then you do not have a problem because ralign is greater than
> ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN.
>  
> > Therefore the test above will be passed and SLAB_RED_ZONE and SLAB_STORE_USER
> > will stay in flags.
> > cache_line_size() will return 256 on s390.
> 
> Looks as if you would have the correct alignment then. I still do not 
> understand where the problem is since you want to align on an 8 byte 
> boundary.

CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB is on. In step 4) we have align = ralign.
Still ok.
Next thing:

	if (flags & SLAB_RED_ZONE) {
		/* redzoning only works with word aligned caches */
		align = BYTES_PER_WORD;

Result: align is less than ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN -> busted.
Same is true if SLAB_STORE_USER is set.
Therefore I masked them both out in my patch.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ