[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200607241828.k6OISdHq014568@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:28:39 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@....de>
Cc: Mike Benoit <ipso@...ppymail.ca>, Hans Reiser <reiser@...esys.com>,
lkml@...productions.com, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@...esys.com>
Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:35:24 +0200, Matthias Andree said:
> Mike Benoit wrote:
>
> > I've been bitten by running out of inodes on several occasions, and by
> > switching to ReiserFS it saved one company I worked for over $250,000
> > because they didn't need to buy a totally new piece of software.
>
> ext3fs's inode density is configurable, reiserfs's hash overflow chain
> length is not, and it doesn't show in df -i either.
Equally important - you can usually *see* "out of inodes" coming on a 'df -i'
long before a reiser3 filesystem hits the wall on a hash issue.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists