linux-kernel - Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ea34i6$185$1@terminus.zytor.com>
Date:	Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org

Followup to:  <200607241857.38889.a1426z@...ab.com>
By author:    Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> 
> Respect what?  The process or the content?
> 
> Rejecting content due to disrespect for process guidelines would be rather 
> sad.
> 

No, it's not.  That's what you have to do to keep the kernel maintainable.

> If the content is worth its salt, it should be accepted w/o delay, then 
> modified to comply with the process guidelines as necessary.  It's what the 
> GPL allows, afterall.

Uhm, no.  That's basically "throw it over the fence and let someone
else fix the crap."  Fix it first, then it can go in.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/