[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060724212257.GD1665@lug-owl.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 23:22:57 +0200
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@...-owl.de>
To: Mike Benoit <ipso@...ppymail.ca>
Cc: "Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand@....utfsm.cl>,
Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@....de>,
Hans Reiser <reiser@...esys.com>, lkml@...productions.com,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@...esys.com>
Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
On Mon, 2006-07-24 13:37:13 -0700, Mike Benoit <ipso@...ppymail.ca> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 14:06 -0400, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> The only other option at that time was to purchase Veritas backup and
> its not cheap. We ended up switching to ReiserFS, it increased our
> backup/restore time immensely and also bought us about 1year before the
> system finally outgrew itself for good. By that time the company could
> afford to drop $250,000 on high end backup software so we could grow
> past 10TB.
Erm, how does your data look like and why does it require a $250,000
backup solution? Sounds like I'm in the wrong business...
But that's for sure not lkml related...
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@...-owl.de +49-172-7608481
Signature of: Don't believe in miracles: Rely on them!
the second :
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists