linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Make touch_nmi_watchdog imply touch_softlockup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060724071546.GA29478@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:15:46 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@...d.feec.vutbr.cz>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make touch_nmi_watchdog imply touch_softlockup_watchdog on all archs


* Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@...d.feec.vutbr.cz> wrote:

> touch_nmi_watchdog() calls touch_softlockup_watchdog() on both 
> architectures that implement it (i386 and x86_64). On other 
> architectures it does nothing at all. touch_nmi_watchdog() should 
> imply touch_softlockup_watchdog() on all architectures. Suggested by 
> Andi Kleen.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@...d.feec.vutbr.cz>

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>

although i suspect this could be cleaned up by consolidating both under 
touch_watchdog(), right?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/