lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1153780937.31581.13.camel@josh-work.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:42:17 -0700
From:	Josh Triplett <josht@...ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: vxfs_readdir locking incorrect: add lock_kernel() or remove
	unlock_kernel()?

Commit 7b2fd697427e73c81d5fa659efd91bd07d303b0e in the historical GIT
tree stopped calling the readdir member of a file_operations struct with
the big kernel lock held, and fixed up all the readdir functions to do
their own locking.  However, that change added calls to unlock_kernel()
in vxfs_readdir (fs/freevxfs/vxfs_lookup.c), but no call to
lock_kernel().  Should vxfs_readdir call lock_kernel(), or should the
calls to unlock_kernel() go away?

- Josh Triplett


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ